Informative implications is talked about
Blum, Paul. 1976. “A relative Study of Impression regarding Family and you will Societal Character Positioning toward Growth of Spiritual Opinions one of Teenagers.”Thesis, College of Notre Dame.
Eisenberg Berg, Nancy. 1976. “New Relation off Political Ideas to Restriction-Based and you will Prosocial Moral Reason.” Developmental Therapy vol. several, pp. 552-553. 76 Light middle-class seventh-12th graders from a good Presbyterian church and you may a good Jewish go camping complete an excellent 41-items political survey and you will a written goal try regarding moral reasoning based on L. Kohlberg’s (1969) conceptualizations. Chi-square analyses revealed that elderly Ss have been a whole lot more liberal and you may humanitarian than younger Ss, and older Ss showed a somewhat expert from moral reason. Correlations anywhere between political emotions scores and you may moral indices partially served the fresh hypothesis you to definitely large degrees of moral need is actually of this much more liberal and humanistic thinking: Liberalism ratings have been significantly associated with brand new prosocial, constraint, and you can mutual moral indices; humanitarian scores was indeed notably related to the fresh new prosocial and you can combined indices, although not this new limitation index. Subsequent studies are must see whether findings generalize some other societal strata. [Source: PI]
Maddock, James W. 1976. “Coming as opposed to History: Youth’s Drama away from Connection.” Spiritual Training vol. 71, pp. 5-16. Abstract: This information shows that a society characterized by chronic social changes and you will major pluralism supplies young people lacking an obvious feeling of identity and you will (thus away from) historical angle, a continuity away from definition through the years. The clear answer, it is debated, is based on relationships youthfulness toward a sense of ethical union once the a link https://datingranking.net/fr/sites-de-rencontre-noirs/ between private identity and you can personal people. The outcome is a great pluralistic society guided from the very first moral sensibilities, a sensible network regarding interpersonal financial obligation, a core off preferred ethical purposes, and you can a provided readiness when planning on taking obligation for framing the future. [Source: RI]
Miller, Kenneth L. 1976. “The partnership regarding Development stages into the Child’s Ethical and you will Religious Considering.” Thesis, Arizona State University.
O’Byrne, Simon. 1976. Ethical Development and you may Logical Cause off Adolescents: A fresh Research study with Adolescent People Contrasting Different Process. Dublin: Frederick Drive.
Blackner, Gary L
Knox, Ian. 1975. “Faith and also the Hopes of Modern society On the Teenage.” Spiritual Knowledge vol. 70, pp. 649-660. Abstract: Discusses implications to possess teenage ethical training of your own pressure ranging from characteristics and you can public needs. Given E. Erikson’s theory of adolescent title innovation and you may psychoanalytic idea typically, brand new theologically essential need to in order to get decrease out-of satisfaction is much more conveniently served by concentrate on the community and you can institutional proportions of faith. [Source: PI]
Peatling, John H., Charles W. Laabs, and Thomas B. Newton. 1975. “Cognitive Development: A good About three-Shot Assessment off Form on Peatling Level of Religious Thinking.” Profile Potential: An eye on Lookup vol. 7, pp. 159-162. Abstract: Opposed form toward 6 Peatling Scales regarding Religious Thought to have step 3 age account. Youngest Ss was in fact 988 people in Lutheran Missouri Synod universities (mediocre levels top, six.4). Old Ss was 1,994 youngsters for the Episcopal universities (mediocre grade top, eight.9). 3,289 adult Ss was indeed from inside the Joined Methodist Adult Bible categories. The predictions which means toward step 3 Abstract Phase Bills carry out boost as we age while means for the 3 Real Balances manage drop off as we grow old was indeed affirmed. Abilities advise that the newest Peatling Scales size Piagetian constructs, upon which these were depending, and you can inferentially exhibit make validity. Abilities mean more rapid growth in religious thinking anywhere between youngsters and you can puberty than between adolescence and you may adulthood. The causes out of development throughout the center adolescence was highlighted by the accessibility 6 scales rather than both summation balances. Results deny the assumption one cognitive development is carried out throughout puberty. [Source: PI]